4.0 PASTORAL FARMING - STATISTICS AND FARM MODEL DEVELOPMENT

_______________________________________________________________________

Key points
  • Approximately 60% of the total land area of the District was in primary productive use, predominantly farming (48%).
  • Farm woodlots accounted for less than 2% of the total farmed area.
  • There were slightly less than 300 pastoral farms in 1993. These carried 1.5 million stock units and employed 684 persons (including owner operators).
  • Two model farms were developed reflecting average farms for their respective classes. The large model farm represented 60 farms carrying on average 13 925 LSU per farm. The small model farm represented approximately 230 farms carrying on average 3568 LSU per farm.
4.1 Source of Statistics

All historical agricultural statistics presented or referenced in this report are derived from Statistics New Zealand publications unless otherwise stated. These statistics are gathered annually through an agricultural census of farmers conducted shortly after 30 June in each year, all data provided being as at that date (i.e. 1981 statistics for livestock relate to numbers on hand at 30 June 1981). Statistics relating to female livestock mated/used for breeding purposes refer to livestock mated in the previous statistical year for the production of offspring in the statistical year concerned. These statistics are not 100% accurate for any one region owing to farmer inaccuracies and uncompleted census returns. However, they do provide the best data set available for the WDC area, and therefore have been used for the review of pastoral land use and production in the 1981-1993 period. It is noted that some regional boundaries on which statistics are prepared changed in 1990. However, the WDC area did not change significantly, and a historical review can be undertaken without adjustment to the statistics.

The variability of the average annual statistics is quite large and does give cause for concern. Specific concerns include recent data for plantation areas, the variability of area in grass, and the decline in both the total occupied area and the area classified as 'other land'. The variability between years and between sources of data relating to employment statistics is also of concern. In the absence of an alternative data source, these statistics are the best available. However, the study makes some small departures from them in instances where the authors consider that a better estimate can be made (e.g. average stocking rate per hectare, as discussed in subsection 4.5).

New technology in remote sensing and GIS may in future provide more accurate and consistent data, but was prohibitively expensive for this study.

4.2 Land use in Wairoa District Council area 1981-1993

The Wairoa District Council Area is described as predominantly steep to very steep hill country, much of which is currently subject to erosion damage. Approximately 48% of the total land area is in grass, and 60% in use. The Land Use Capability (LUC) classes for the area have been mapped by Landcare Research (see Map 2 and Table 3.5). Land above class (5) is hill country and it is mainly class (6) and (7) areas on which land-use changes from pastoral to forestry use are occurring.

A summary of WDC land-use statistics is presented in Table 4.1. Important factors associated with these statistics are summarised as:

  1. A farm is defined for statistical purposes as any area of land used for or potentially usable for horticulture, cropping, livestock or exotic forestry operations. In the WDC area, the number of holdings and total area in use peaked in 1986, and then declined to the lowest level in the survey period in 1992/93.
  2. The total land area encompassed by farms steadily decreased over the period to 1993. It is noted that the category 'other land' also declined over the period. Other land includes conservation plantings and indigenous vegetation (as well as horticulture and non-productive uses), and it is possible that census respondents are understating these areas as they are no longer judged potentially usable for pastoral farming purposes. This conclusion is supported by the comparatively static area of the District reported as the 'grassed area' (which includes grassland, tussock/danthonia and lucerne).
  3. The most important land-use statistic is the grassed area. This is the area used for pastoral farming, and peaked in 1982 (following uptake of Government-funded land development incentive schemes). The grassed area reported has remained relatively static during the period (1981 to 1991) after allowing for minor fluctuations in the total number of census returns annually. The decline between 1991 and 1993 is an expected trend arising as a result of increased afforestation of pastoral areas during that period. The fluctuation recorded in 1988 may have resulted from the aftermath of Cyclone Bola, respondents taking into account the pastoral damage incurred. For purposes of this study, the statistic reported for the 1993 year of 194 149 hectares of grassland in the WDC area is used as the starting point for analysis.
  4. The average area and average grassed area per holding are of general interest only in that the total number of holdings includes smallholdings, forests and horticultural and cropping units as well as traditional pastoral farms. The range about this average is probably greater than 100% (see Table 4.1 for the average areas per holding over the period 1981 to 1993).
  5. The area recorded as plantations relates to exotic trees planted for timber, and includes exotic species shelter belts planted in three rows or more. Statistics indicate continuing forest development until 1987. Between 1988 and 1991 the plantation area remained relatively static (a factor predominantly associated with high interest rates and changes to forestry taxation occurring at that time).
Table 4.1 Summary of land-use trends in the Wairoa District Council Area 1981-1993
Year Ended 30 June 1981 1982 1983 1984
Number of holdings 472 481 502 496
Total area 282 792 280 753 282 808 284 185
Grassed area 197 361 207 107 206 106 199 213
Plantations 17 118 18 831 20 676 23 206
Other land 68 313 54 815 56 026 61 766
Av. holding area 599.1 583.7 563.4 573.0
Av. grass area/holding 418.1 430.6 410.6 401.6
Year Ended 30 June 1985 1986 1987 1988
Number of holdings 502 507 493 477
Total area 283 674 283 955 279 106 277 116
Grassed area 193 199 194 098 195 417 189 742
Plantations 24 490 26 032 28 011 28 348
Other land 65 985 63 825 55 678 59 026
Av. holding area 565.1 560.1 566.1 581.0
Av. grass area/holding 384.9 382.8 396.4 397.8
Year Ended 30 June 1989 1990 1991 1992
Number of holdings 475 453 447 441
Total area 264 862 264 580 266 198 253 113
Grassed area 194 072 195 083 198 686 191 388
Plantations 26 239 26 804 28 338 22 778
Other land 44 551 42 693 39 174 38 947
Av. holding area 557.6 584.1 595.5 573.9
Av. grassed area/holding 408.6 430.7 444.5 434.0
Year Ended 30 June 1993
Number of holdings 443
Total area 260 536
Grassed area 194 149
Plantations 33 419
Other land 32 968
Av. holding area 588.1
Av. grassed area/holding 438.3

Note: From an estimated 300 pastoral farms in 1993, the average grassed area per pastoral farm is calculated as 647 hectares.

Statistics for 1992 indicate a substantial decrease in plantation area, and this is difficult to explain other than through a possible non-return of census information by some forest owners. The 1993 statistics appear to be more in line with expectations, given known increases in plantings between 1991 and 1993. (The statistical data indicate an increase in the exotic forest area of 5081 ha in this two-year period.) A similar decrease in pastoral land occurred between the 1991 and 1993 years (a decrease of 4537 hectares), and a decrease of 49 674 LSUs is also recorded for this period (10.9 LSU/grassed hectare, if all related to forestry expansion).

  1. The important statistic for this study is the 1993 grassed (pastoral) area of 194 149 hectares.
  2. Information obtained from the MAF Quality Management division of the Ministry of Agriculture and Fisheries indicated that, at 30 June 1994, there were 289 separate pastoral farm holdings carrying sheep and/or beef cattle in the WDC region with an area greater than 5 hectares. If this figure is adjusted to 300 pastoral farms at 30 June 1993 (thus allowing for dairy farms and any specialist deer farms), the average pastoral farm area in 1993 would be as follows.
Average farm area (excluding plantations) 757 ha
Average grass area per farm 647 ha (85.5%)

(The statistic of 289 pastoral sheep and/or beef farms at 30 June 1994 was obtained from the MAF Quality Management Agribase Farm Location Project.)

  1. The difference between the total area farmed and the total District Council area of 412 750 ha is mainly made up of urban areas, roads, very small rural holdings and DOC estates.
4.3 Total Livestock Numbers 1981-1993

Livestock numbers for specific years in the period 1981 to 1993 have been sourced from Statistics NZ. The years chosen include 1981, 1986, 1991, 1992 and 1993, and the related statistics are contained in Appendices 3.1.1 to 3.1.5. The important factors arising from these statistics are summarised below.

(i) The total livestock units (LSUs) changed over the period as follows.

Year

Appendix

Total LSUs

LSU's/grassed ha

1981

3.1.1

1 799 944

9.12

1986

3.1.2

1 816 449

9.36

1991

3.1.3

1 552 375

7.81

1992

3.1.4

1 505 741

7.86

1993

3.1.5

1 502 701

7.74

  1. Livestock numbers increased until the mid 1980s encouraged by Government-funded land development schemes, livestock product pricing policies (SMPs) and other subsidised assistance provided to the agricultural sector. Following the commencement of deregulation and restructuring of the NZ economy post 1984, the economic conditions in the primary sector at the farm gate level deteriorated markedly, and a decline in livestock numbers began. Main reasons for the decline included falling fertility due to severe cutbacks of fertiliser on marginal land, low product prices, high interest rates, changes to livestock taxation, Cyclone Bola damage, the 1989 drought, and, more recently, changes in land use from pastoral to forestry enterprises. This decline is expected to continue at least until 30 June 1995 for reasons of land-use change to forestry. The decrease in livestock numbers between 1986 and 1993 amounted to 17.3% in total, and is greater than the New Zealand average of about an 8% decline over that period.
  2. Sheep and beef cattle comprise 96.7% of total livestock units at 30 June 1993, with only marginal variations to this ratio over the 1981-93 period. The sheep-to-cattle ratio has changed from 61:39 in 1986 to 54:46 in 1993, owing mainly to product price changes in favour of beef cattle, and also to farm management factors (including those associated with decreased labour requirements). In total, sheep LSUs have decreased by 27.2% and cattle LSUs by only 3.0% in the period 1986-1993. Sheep and beef cattle accounted for an average stocking rate per grassed hectare of 7.47 LSU/ha out of the total 7.74 LSU/ha in 1993.
  3. Dairying accounts for 1.2% of LSUs at 1993, and the expansion or contraction of this small pastoral activity is unlikely to be directly affected by future land-use changes to forestry.
  4. Deer numbers increased to a peak in 1992, accounting for 1.7% of total LSUs in that year. In 1993 a decrease in deer numbers is recorded (of 18%), this coming about as a result of falling product prices, a higher-than-usual stock carryover in the 1992 year and, to a smaller degree, through land-use change.
  5. Goat numbers increased markedly in the mid 1980s, but significantly decreased thereafter owing to the decline in market demand for both live feral goats and their cashmere products. However, it is noted that there are much greater numbers of goats in the WDC area than are recorded as being 'farmed' in the agricultural statistics. These are feral animals, retained on many properties for reasons related to weed control rather than productive output, and are probably not considered to be farmed by some census respondents.
4.4 Farm owners and employees

Statistics NZ agricultural data (Table 4.2) identifies the number of people employed on farms in the Wairoa District area.

Factors of note include the following.

  1. A large decrease in paid full-time employees occurred in the 1991 year, without a compensating increase in the number of self-employed workers, as national statistics may indicate.
Table 4.2 Farm employment in the Wairoa District

Year

No. of farms Working owners, lease-holders and sharemilkers No. of paid full time employees Total
1986

1989

1991

1992

1993

507

475

447

441

443

465

408

426

415

382

332

256

211

270

302

797

664

637

685

684

  1. Agriculture Statistics do not include paid part-time employees, but data for working owners, leaseholders and sharemilkers do include part-time employment statistics.
  2. The definition of farms includes all holdings irrespective of their use, and thus encompasses horticultural holdings, forest areas, etc. It is noted that there are approximately 300 livestock farms in the District.
  3. In the case of family partnerships, more than one working owner per property may be recorded (e.g. in a husband-and-wife partnership).
  4. A separate analysis of 1991 Industry Statistics indicates that a total of 609 people worked on sheep, beef and mixed farms in the district (out of a total of 753 working on all farms). It is noted that these statistics do not agree with the Agricultural Statistics for 1991.
  5. On the basis of the employment input/output data analysed in this study and derived from WDC model farms and farmer surveys, the total number of full-time equivalents on sheep and beef farms would be about 590 workers (0.34 per 1000 LSUs, assuming an average 9 LSU/grassed ha).
  6. While of interest, the absolute or correct number of farm workers in the District is not an important factor, as the study analyses the labour loss with land-use change on a separate basis.
  7. Industry statistics 1991 records that 36 workers were employed in forestry and logging in the WDC area.
4.5 Describing farm businesses - development of representative farm models

Two whole-farm models have been developed to represent Wairoa pastoral farming properties. Base data has been derived from representative farms used by Agriculture New Zealand consultants in the preparation of the MAF Farm Monitoring Report. These farms are all located in the Wairoa District Council area, and are not amalgamated with the Gisborne representative farms as occurs for purposes of the MAF Farm Monitoring Report. Production indices are set at average levels, and prices and costs used are those current in the 1994/95 financial year.

From these two farm models a weighted average model has been calculated, and is used in the analysis of the impact of land-use change in section 8.0 (note that the computer software associated with this study can very quickly analyse impacts using only the small or large farm model data). The two models developed are summarised as follows.

(i) Large farm model
Represents approximately 20% of farms and 53% of the total pastoral (effective) area.
Farm area: 1654 hectares (effective)
Livestock units: Sheep 8 603 (61.8%)
Cattle 5 322 (38.2%)
Total 13 925
Average stocking rate: 8.42 LSU/effective hectare
Lambing percentage: 88%
Calving percentage: 90%
(ii) Small farm model
Represents approximately 80% of farms and 47% of the total pastoral (effective) area.
Farm area: 367.5 hectares (effective)
Livestock units: Sheep 2 202 (61.7%)
Cattle 1 366 (38.3%)
Total 3 568 LSUs
Average stocking rate: 9.7 LSU/effective hectare
Lambing percentage: 109%
Calving percentage: 88%

The weighting given the two models (20% and 80% of total farms) encompasses a total grassed area of 187 500 hectares. This correlates relatively well with the Statistics New Zealand total of 194 149 grassed hectares in 1993 when considering the relatively large farms sold to forestry between June 1993 and December 1994, and grassed areas in other uses. (Note: a ratio of 21% large farms and 79% small farms would correspond to a grassed area of 191 300 hectares.)

Both models are restricted to sheep and cattle farming. Other livestock types in the district account for only 3.3% of total livestock units:

Dairy 1.1%
Deer 0.8%
Goats 0.9%
Total 3.3%

(1993 Agricultural Statistics)

Dairy farms are unlikely to be converted to forestry, and are therefore excluded from analysis. Goats are operated mainly as a feral enterprise for weed control, and deer are farmed on a minority of properties, with total numbers including breeding stock only 12 300 in 1993. However, it is noted that the analyses of farm models include all costs of deer and goats in the budgets prepared, and the item 'other farm income' will include income arising from these livestock types (and is about 1% of total farm income).

The farm models are analysed with constant stock numbers (status quo state). No off-farm income is included.

4.5.1 Model Development

The models' physical and financial details were developed on the basis of 1000 livestock units, with total farm costs directly apportioned on a cost per LSU basis. Farm income was calculated separately for sheep and cattle through livestock reconciliation analysis, also on the basis of 1000 LSU groups. The results of these two model analyses are then amalgamated into a weighted average model.

The use of a 1000 LSU base permits easier analysis of the effect of differing levels of reduction in livestock numbers at both the whole-farm and marginal levels, given that the model farms from which they were developed are 'averages' and don't reflect the range of farm sizes and stock carried within each of the two groupings. However, the 1000 LSU models can be grossed up to actual farm size by simple multiplication. Further, the effects of differing stocking rates and effective farm areas can also be analysed using the 1000 LSU base methodology.

The sheep-to-beef ratios of approximately 62:38 as contained in the derived models do not reflect the ratios recorded by Statistics NZ in their 1993 Agricultural Statistics. The official statistics record a ratio of 54:46. In order to more closely align the models to actual statistics, the sheep-to-cattle ratio was adjusted to the statistical levels for income assessment purposes and for calculating livestock numbers of each type available for sale. (The actual adjustment made was a ratio of 53.5:46.5 sheep to cattle, and was based on provisional 1993 statistics made available before their official release.) Costs other than those directly related to livestock (e.g. shearing, purchases and transport) were not adjusted. To indicate that this adjustment had an insignificant effect on income levels, the following summarised figures are provided.

Small farms Large farms
Income from sheep and wool (nett of
purchases, transport and shearing) $35.73/LSU $28.34/LSU
Income from cattle (nett of
purchases and transport) $34.54/LSU $27.50/LSU
Difference between sheep
and cattle $1.19/LSU $0.84/LSU
Effect on income of changing
the ratio -$0.10/LSU -$0.07/LSU

The effects on income per LSU (decrease of 10 cents and 7 cents per LSU) are insignificant. This is a necessary adjustment in order to better estimate the reductions in stock numbers available for slaughter by livestock type as land-use change occurs.

Full details of the physical and financial structure of the two models and a weighted average of the two (based on 1000 LSU groups) are contained in Appendices 3.2 and 3.3. These appendix tables are referenced below for ease of access.

Small farms Large farms
Details of assumptions made App 3.2 App 3.2
Whole farm stock numbers 3.2.1 3.2.7
Sheep reconciliation per 1000 sheep LSU 3.2.2 3.2.8
Wool account per 1000 sheep LSU 3.2.3 3.2.9
Cattle reconciliation per 1000 cattle LSU 3.2.4 3.2.10
Financial budget per 1000 total LSU 3.2.5 3.2.11
Stock numbers per 1000 total LSU (including sales data and destination) 3.2.6 3.2.12
Weighted average farm
Weighted average model budget App. 3.3
Stock nos per 1000 total LSU 3.3.1
(including sales data and destination)
Average farm capital repayment, income tax, and disposable surplus 3.3.2
Livestock salvage value 3.4
4.5.2 Summary of average farm model indices

This subsection briefly summarises the main indices in the weighted average farm model on a per 1000 LSU basis.

Total sheep 586
Total cattle 90
Sheep sold to slaughter 250
Cattle sold to slaughter 16.7
Sheep sold as store stock 99
Cattle sold as store stock 16.2
Gross income per LSU ($) 34.93
Farm expenditure per LSU ($) 24.38
Cash Farm Income per LSU ($) 10.55
Disposable surplus (after capital
repayments and income tax) per LSU ($) 6.08
Full-time labour equivalents on farm 0.30 per 1000 LSU
Full-time labour equivalents shearing 0.04 per 1000 LSU
Lamb equivalents slaughtered 372 per 1000 LSU
Wages paid per 1000 LSU ($) 5740
4.5.3 Stocking rates and total effective area

The model farm developed for this study has an average stocking rate calculated as 9 LSU per grassed hectare. As previously noted, this is higher than the estimated Statistics NZ level of 7.7 LSU per hectare. A number of other estimates of average stocking rate per hectare were obtained, and all are summarised below.

Wairoa Survey (91 farms)
Large farms 8.9 LSU/grassed ha
Small farms 10.9 LSU/grassed ha
Average 9.8 LSU/grassed ha
Valuation NZ (farms sold) 7.6 LSU/grassed ha
Farm Monitoring 9.0 LSU/grassed ha
Agricultural Census (statistics) 7.7 LSU/grassed ha

In addition, the question of average District stocking rate was discussed with a number of Wairoa farmers, whose estimates varied between 9.0 and 9.5 LSU per grassed hectare.

Given the wide variation between sources, and the wish to avoid underestimating the agricultural impact of land-use change to forestry, the average stocking rate of 9 LSU/grassed hectare as calculated in the model has been accepted for the purpose of this study.

A further adjustment is required to account for land on farms not currently used for farming, but which is likely to be planted in forest at the same time as the pastoral areas. Farmers surveyed in the District estimated their ineffective area to be 18% of the farm. This aligns with official statistics data associated with 'other land' of 15%. Thus, for purposes of this study, it is assumed that for every 1000 hectares of planted forest, 85% (850 hectares) is currently in pastoral use and 15% (150 hectares) in clearable scrub. On an adjusted basis, the average stocking rate over the total area reduces to 7.7 LSU per hectare. This is the level of reduction of livestock numbers per hectare of planted forest used in this study. (Variations about this average are analysed and discussed in section 8.3.1, which evaluates the impacts on the agricultural sector of land-use change.)

It is also noted that the stocking rate calculated using Statistics New Zealand livestock numbers is not calculated on a class-by-class basis. The livestock numbers are very aggregated, and the average stock units applied to each group may be marginally lower than actual for some groups (particularly cattle). This would contribute to a lower stocking rate than actual being calculated, and would explain - at least in part - the variation between the District average and that modelled.

_______________________________________________________________________

Previous Page TOC Next Page

Contact for Enquiries

Rural Affairs Coordinator
Sector Performance Policy
MAF Policy
Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry
PO Box 2526
Wellington
NEW ZEALAND

Phone: +64 4 894 0675
Fax: +64 4 4 894 0745
Contact this person

 




Biosecurity New Zealand Web Site