Previous PageTable Of ContentsNext Page



Characteristics of Supporting Infrastructure

Telephone Line Quality

Telephone line quality is a critical issue for delivering telecommunications services. Quality can be measured in a range of ways, including the speed with which information is transmitted, the signal-to-noise ratio, reliability of being able to establish a connection, and ability to maintain a connection.

In the urban telephone system, poor quality lines are simply not accepted. The rural phone system is more difficult to maintain, with longer wire runs, and is significantly more expensive to maintain per user due to the low population density for the given infrastructure.

Respondents were asked if they experienced problems with their telephone lines. Over half (58%) of the respondents stated that they did have ongoing problems with their telephone lines (Table 9).

Table 9. Telephone line quality
Telephone Lines Problems

Percentage (Including slow Internet access speed)

Percentage (Excluding slow Internet access speed)

Yes

58

54

No

42

46

Internet access speed problems can originate from a number of causes in addition to the telephone lines. However, even when Internet access speed is removed as a type of problem, 54% of respondents still reported line problems. In most instances where Internet speed is reported as a problem, other line problems are also reported.

The types of problems being reported were fairly evenly spread across reporting categories. In Table 10, the telephone line problems are characterised. (Note that the total is well in excess of 100% as many people reported more than one ongoing problem.)

Table 10. Characterisation of source of telephone line problems

Type of Problem

Percentage Reporting This Problem

Line is dropped (i.e. connection is interrupted)

20

Slow access speed

25

Line noise

24

Exchange overloading

18

Electric fence interference

22

Unknown

1

Other

12

A survey by Rural Women New Zealand regarding telephone issues (Rural Women New Zealand, 2000) identified a similar litany of problems. While their survey analysis methodology is unclear, the top ranking problems identified in their survey were overloaded lines, fax problems, Internet access problems, and poor cell phone coverage. By far the problem with highest ranking was overloading.

Effect Of Distance From Nearest Population Centre

The proportion of respondents reporting problems was found to generally increase with distance from the nearest town or village.

Table 11, Figure 4, and Figure 5 illustrate the relationship between distance from the nearest town and village, and the proportion of respondents reporting problems.

Table 11. Relationship between distance from town and level of problems
Distance (kms)

% with problems

(Distance from town)

% with problems

(Distance from village)

0-5

39

44

5.1-10

51

57

10.1-15

46

56

15.1-20

52

58

20.1-25

58

68

25.1-30

49

69

30.1-35

62

 
35.1-40

78

 
40.1-50

56

82

50.1-60

54

 
60.1-80

61

 
80+

69

 
Figure 4. Relationship between distance to town and problems

Relationship between distance to town and problems

Figure 5. Relationship between distance to village and problems

Relationship between distance to village and problems

The proportion of respondents reporting problems clearly increases with distance from the nearest population centres, with a more clear trend being evident when distance from village is used as the proxy for distance from a telephone exchange. The proportion of locations reporting telephone line-related problems rises almost linearly from 44% for locations within 0-5km of a village, to 82% for locations over 30km from a village.

Internet Access Speed

In the days when voice calls and fax were virtually the only telecommunication requirements, a minimum data rate of 9.6kbps was quite acceptable. With the advent of Internet access via phone line, data transmission rates become critical to the Internet experience. Internet Service Providers generally consider 33kbps access to be an absolute minimum acceptable transfer rate for current Internet use.

Respondents who had connection to the Internet were asked their opinion on their access speed (Table 12).

Table 12. Opinion on speed of Internet access
Opinion Percentage
Speed is "OK" 31
Needs to be faster 69

Approximately two-thirds of respondents reported that they wanted faster Internet service. However, it is not possible to determine how much of an impact the quality of telephone line played in this opinion, as apparent Internet response times are the result of the interaction of many potential bottlenecks, many of them not lines related.

Second Phone Lines

With the advent of Dial-up Internet access there is often a need to add a second phone line to accommodate extended Internet use without disrupting telephone communications. Generally, copper-wire based "local loop" telecommunications infrastructure ends at the edge of a property, and it is then the responsibility of the person wanting to use the service to pay for any extra lines to be run from the edge of the property (the demarc) to point of service within the property. In the case of rural properties, this distance can be hundreds of metres, and running additional lines can be expensive.

Telecom in their submission to the Ministerial Review (Telecom, 2000b) provide comment on the issue of new lines, stating that their own policy on service obligation goes beyond the Kiwi Share, and includes "connecting customers if the customer will pay 30% of the capital over $2000". This policy is currently under review as it still represents a significant subsidy. It seems this is a no-win situation for rural service users and Telecom, as lines into rural areas are expensive.

Of the people responding to the survey, 78% reported that they had never tried to have additional telephone lines run into their location. Of the 22% who have tried to get additional lines installed, one-third failed to achieve this (Table 13). No information was sought from respondents as to the reasons for this failure.

Table 13. Installation of additional telephone lines
Action

Percentage

Successfully installed

16

Failed to achieve

6

Never Tried

78

Quality Of Power Supply

While the focus of the survey is on telecommunications services and infrastructure, mains power supply does impact on these aspects. Respondents were asked if they believed that they have power supply problems, and if they did have problems, did they use a power conditioner to rectify the problems ? (Table 14). Power supply problems were experienced by over a third of respondents.

Table 14. Quality of power supply
Power Supply Problem

Percentage

No problems

51

Problems exist

37

Use a power conditioner

3

Unknown

8

Not on mains power

1

Emergency Services 111

Just over 14% of the survey respondents stated that they have contacted 111 Emergency Services at least once in the last two years. Of those respondents who called 111, 63% had contacted Emergency Services on more than one occasion during that period. This indicates the importance of the 111 Emergency Services to rural communities.

Of the 14% of respondents who contacted 111, almost 1 in 5 (19%) had encountered problems.

A survey by Rural Women New Zealand (Rural Women New Zealand, 2000) showed that over all respondents, 7% reported problems with 111 Emergency Services. This was higher than the 3% reported in this survey.

Table 15. Emergency Services 111 Calls
Experience with 111

Percentage

Never Used

86

Used without problem

11

Used and experienced problem

3

The problems reported in this survey largely centred on difficulties associated with location and time. Around 56% of the reported problems were due to a lack of location knowledge on the part of the 111 operator, and 30% of the reported problems were related to the length of time to get a response when 111 was called. These are not strictly telecommunication problems, but relate to the centralisation of emergency response staff. Two respondents indicated difficulties in getting a phone line due to exchange overloading. The list of problems reported can be found in Appendix IV: List Of Problems Encountered With 111 Service.

Mobile Coverage

Mobile coverage statistics from mobile service providers are generally based on a 4 watt car kit system. However, the more usual handheld mobile phone has significantly different reception and transmission characteristics, and complaints about rural coverage are common. Respondents were asked to characterise the mobile phone coverage in their area (Table 16).

Table 16. Opinion on mobile phone coverage by owners
Comment

Percentage

No problem with coverage

24

Problems with coverage, but not bad enough to affect ability to conduct business

35

Significant problems with coverage which affect ability to conduct business

41

Mobile coverage is definitely a significant issue for the rural community. Of those owning mobile phones, only 24% report no problems, but 41% reported very significant problems. Of those who provided specific comments about coverage, 15% mentioned use of a mobile phone as a safety measure in rural areas, and how this is affected by inadequate coverage.

Comments on mobile coverage can be found listed in Appendix V: List Of Comments On Cellular Coverage.

Of those not owning a mobile phone, 45% gave poor coverage as the reason they did not own one.

Party Lines

Party lines are no longer a significant issue in New Zealand. Party lines have been reduced from 40,000 in the early 1980s to 200-228 today (Telecom, 2000a reports 228 remaining party lines; Ministry of Economic Development, 2000 reports 200 remaining party lines). While the remaining party lines are no doubt annoying in the extreme to the individuals still using them, they are no longer a policy issue in the wider sense. Note that Telecom NZ (J.Rodenburg, pers communication with I Parminter, MAF Policy) recently reported that the remaining party lines will be upgraded to individual lines in their 2000/2001 financial year. None of the survey responses analysed reported a party line.

© MAF 2000
MAFnet Help Last updated: 28-Nov-2002 Important Disclaimer

Previous PageTable Of ContentsNext Page

Contact for Enquiries

Rural Affairs Coordinator
Sector Performance Policy
MAF Policy
Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry
PO Box 2526
Wellington
NEW ZEALAND

Phone: +64 4 894 0675
Fax: +64 4 4 894 0745
Contact this person

 




Biosecurity New Zealand Web Site